The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is more than just a scientific breakthrough; it is reshaping global power dynamics by impacting economies, societies, and governance systems (1). Digital sovereignty, shaping how countries manage their data and safeguard citizens' rights, is becoming increasingly crucial in this context (2). For Europe, this presents both challenges and opportunities for Europe, making it essential to navigate the complexities of AI innovation while ensuring ethical AI governance. To remain competitive with the US and China, who are rapidly accelerating their dominance in AI, collaborative efforts and significant investments are necessary (3, 4). However, the EU’s strong focus on ethical AI and regulatory oversight risks slowing down innovation if regulations become too restrictive (5).
In response, the EU is striving to secure a leading role in AI development. The InvestAI initiative, a €200 billion fund, is a significant step toward strengthening AI and digital infrastructure (6). While Europe’s commitment to ethical AI governance strengthens trust and aligns with its core values, it also raises a dilemma: Can the EU maintain global competitiveness without adapting its regulatory approach? Striking the right balance between oversight and innovation will determine whether Europe remains a leader in AI or risks falling behind more aggressive global players.
Global approaches to AI governance
AI governance approaches vary significantly across the world, reflecting distinct geopolitical priorities. “America innovates, Asia replicates, Europe regulates,” a statement by Barry Gill, head of investments at UBS Asset Management, encapsulates the challenges Europe faces regarding this AI revolution (7). Europe prioritizes data protection and human rights, with frameworks such as the GDPR and the EU AI Act ensuring ethical and responsible AI (8). Ethical and responsible AI governance focuses on aligning AI systems with principles of fairness, accountability, transparency, and inclusivity (8). In contrast, the US adopts a more market-driven approach, favoring innovation and economic growth with decentralized oversight, as seen in voluntary guidelines like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (9). Meanwhile, China follows a government-driven approach, leveraging AI for social governance and state security (8). So where US tech giants and Chinese state-backed enterprises continue expanding and investing in AI capabilities at an unprecedented pace, Europe is struggling to keep pace in their highly regulated system.
Regulatory hurdles: is Europe falling behind?
Europe’s strict AI regulations have sparked criticism for potentially stifling innovation and making it difficult for startups to scale. While US and Chinese firms operate with fewer constraints, European companies must navigate compliance-heavy environments, which some experts argue could deter investment and drive AI talent to less regulated markets (10, 11). Lengthy approval processes and legal uncertainties may further discourage risk-taking, slowing down the development of a thriving AI ecosystem. The result could be a significant delay in innovation, putting Europe at a competitive disadvantage (10).
Beyond regulatory hurdles, geopolitical factors also shape Europe’s AI strategy, adding complexity to its global position. Stricter enforcement of AI regulations on major US tech firms could lead to trade tensions, particularly if a future Trump administration retaliates with tariffs on European exports (22). At the same time, Europe’s reliance on foreign AI providers raises concerns over data security, regulatory control, and the ability to develop competitive homegrown solutions (22). Recognizing these challenges, the European Commission has recently introduced new AI investment initiatives aimed at strengthening research capabilities, supporting startups, and ensuring the development of secure and ethical AI applications (23). These efforts underscore the EU’s commitment to maintaining AI leadership while addressing concerns about foreign dependence.
Investing in AI to secure competitiveness
To ensure a fair and competitive AI landscape, European countries are actively working to reduce the dominance of large American and Asian tech companies while creating more opportunities for local innovation. Nations such as the Netherlands, France, and Germany are advocating for policies under the Digital Markets Act to level the playing field and support European startups (12, 13). In addition, the EU has launched initiatives like InvestAI and research funding programs to balance ethical oversight with technological leadership as it aims to lead in responsible AI (14, 15). By providing grants and investment incentives, these efforts help companies meet compliance requirements without stifling innovation. EU research funding programs also encourage collaboration between universities, businesses, and policymakers to develop AI solutions that reflect European values of transparency, fairness, and accountability (15, 16).
However, without significantly increasing investment in homegrown AI infrastructure, the EU risks falling behind and losing strategic autonomy in critical technology sectors. This urgency was highlighted at the AI Paris summit, where discussions shifted from AI safety to the need for greater investment, as European leaders acknowledged the growing gap between Europe and its American and Chinese counterparts (17, 18). France has taken the lead with Macron’s €109 billion AI investment, reaffirming Europe's ambition to compete in an AI race long dominated by the US and China (19).
Nevertheless, the competition remains fierce, with America’s $500 billion Stargate initiative and China’s DeepSeek AI breakthrough pushing the boundaries of technological advancement. Meanwhile, critics argue that Europe’s stringent regulations could stifle innovation and leave the EU struggling to keep pace. Striking the right balance between regulatory oversight and strategic investment will ultimately determine whether Europe can secure its place as a leader in AI or fall behind in the rapidly evolving global race (20).
Strategic partnerships: a path to innovation within regulation
Is there a way forward for Europe in the global AI race? One promising approach is forming strategic partnerships that drive innovation while maintaining compliance with EU regulations. Case studies demonstrate that collaboration between industry leaders and AI firms is essential to developing cutting-edge AI solutions without compromising regulatory requirements.
A notable example is Mistral AI's partnership with Veolia, which utilizes AI-driven predictive analytics to optimize water and waste management. This collaboration proves that AI-driven sustainability can flourish within the EU's regulatory framework. By integrating AI into resource management, Veolia enhances efficiency in water conservation, waste reduction, and energy optimization while adhering to strict environmental and data protection regulations. This case underscores that compliance does not have to stifle innovation; rather, AI can be a powerful tool in advancing sustainability goals within regulatory boundaries (24).
Similarly, Orange has joined forces with Mistral AI to accelerate AI development in Europe, focusing on open-source models to bolster digital sovereignty and reduce reliance on non-European providers. By prioritizing open-source AI, this initiative fosters transparency, interoperability, and ethical deployment, reinforcing the EU's vision of responsible AI innovation (25). These collaborations highlight a viable path forward for Europe: leveraging strategic partnerships to ensure that AI advances align with European values, striking a balance between regulatory oversight and technological progress.
Finally, we need to ask ourselves whether regulations necessarily stifle innovation in the first place. Proponents of regulations argue that AI has never operated in a legal vacuum, as protections have always been in place (26). Catelijne Muller, from the Alliance for the responsible use of AI (ALLAI) emphasized that laws exist to prevent harm, not hinder innovation, just as safety standards in aviation and pharmaceuticals do. The real challenge lies in aligning oversight with technological progress, ensuring Europe remains competitive without compromising its values (26).
Strengthening Europe’s AI leadership
Europe stands at a crossroads in the AI race, striving to balance innovation, ethics, and strategic autonomy. While the EU’s strong regulatory framework ensures responsible AI development, it also risks slowing down progress if regulations become overly restrictive. At the same time, growing dependence on foreign AI providers threatens Europe’s digital sovereignty, making investment in homegrown solutions more critical than ever.
Strategic partnerships, such as those between Mistral AI and Veolia or Orange, demonstrate that AI-driven innovation can thrive within the EU’s regulatory framework. These collaborations prove that compliance and competitiveness are not mutually exclusive but rather complementary forces when supported by the right policies and investments. The EU’s commitment to initiatives like InvestAI and research funding programs highlights its ambition to lead in responsible AI, yet significant challenges remain. Without increasing investment and streamlining regulations to encourage AI adoption, Europe risks falling behind in a landscape dominated by the US and China.
Ultimately, the debate should not be whether regulations stifle innovation but how they can be refined to foster AI leadership without compromising European values. The EU’s ability to strike the right balance between oversight and technological progress will determine whether it emerges as a global AI leader or struggles to keep pace in an increasingly competitive world. The time for decisive action is now. Shall we?
This article is part of The Outside World, ftrprf’s very own research center.
For organizations, it’s pivotal to thoroughly understand what is happening in society. We help companies generate comprehensive insights into societal change and its potential effects on their strategy and operations, both negative and positive. With actionable societal insights, courageous plans, and a can-do mentality, we connect the outside world to your company's strategy. For these outside-world insights, we use a rigorous methodology that includes data processing, quantitative and qualitative analysis, and a thorough review process to ensure the accuracy and consistency of our findings.
For more information, please contact theoutsideworld@ftrprf.com.
Sources:
1. Klein, Maria. 2025. Digital Sovereignty: Challenges and Opportunities for the EU in a Globalized World. January 1, 2025. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5078881.
2. Hulkó, Gábor, János Kálmán, and András Lapsánszky. 2025. “The Politics of Digital Sovereignty and the European Union’s Legislation: Navigating Crises.” Frontiers in Political Science 7. February 5, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1548562.
3. Verhagen, Laurens. 2025. “Europese AI-top is balanceeract tussen meer regels en meer investeringen” De Volkskrant. February 10, 2025. https://www.volkskrant.nl/ai/europese-ai-top-is-balanceeract-tussen-meer-regels-en-meer-investeringen~bc488b9a/.
4. Vlot, Marco. 2025. “‘Op technologisch vlak is China op meerdere fronten verder dan de VS’”. February 17, 2025. https://fd.nl/financiele-markten/1545940/op-technologisch-vlak-is-china-op-meerdere-fronten-verder-dan-de-vs.
5. Bakker, Tim, and Otto Barten. 2025. “Nederland is niet voorbereid op de risico’s van de rap naderende AI-revolutie”. NRC. February 7, 2025. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/02/07/nederland-is-niet-voorbereid-op-de-risicos-van-de-rap-naderende-ai-revolutie-a4882371.
6. NOS Nieuws. 2025. “Europese Commissie wil AI-fonds met 200 miljard euro optuigen”. February 11, 2025. https://nos.nl/artikel/2555413-europese-commissie-wil-ai-fonds-met-200-miljard-euro-optuigen.
7. Vlot, Marco. 2025 “‘Op technologisch vlak is China op meerdere fronten verder dan de VS’”. February 17, 2025. https://fd.nl/financiele-markten/1545940/op-technologisch-vlak-is-china-op-meerdere-fronten-verder-dan-de-vs.
8. Batool, Amna, Didar Zowghi, and Muneera Bano. 2025. “AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review.” AI and Ethics, January 14, 2025. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00653-w
9. “AI RMF.” n.d. https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/airmf/.
10. Ditsche, Jochen, Maria Mikhaylenko. 2024. “European AI Act: Opportunities and Challenges.” Roland Berger (blog). May 8, 2024. https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/European-AI-Act-Opportunities-and-challenges.html.
11. Ouwerkerk, Gabi. 2025. “Techbedrijf Bird ziet geen toekomst in Nederland: ’Europa bezig met economische zelfdestructie’.” De Telegraaf. February 24, 2025. https://www.telegraaf.nl/financieel/2079323681/techbedrijf-bird-ziet-geen-toekomst-in-nederland-europa-bezig-met-economische-zelfdestructie
12. Schouten, Vian. 2025. “Nederland wil eerlijker AI-speelveld: minder macht voor Amerikaanse techreuzen.” De Telegraaf. February 10, 2025. https://www.telegraaf.nl/financieel/1483546567/nederland-wil-eerlijker-ai-speelveld-minder-macht-voor-amerikaanse-techreuzen
13. De Koning, Marloes. 2025. “Onze afhankelijkheid van Big Tech is gevaarlijk, waarschuwen techneuten. Ze willen een Nederlandse cloud bouwen.” NRC. February 12, 2025. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/02/12/onze-afhankelijkheid-van-big-tech-is-gevaarlijk-waarschuwen-techneuten-de-oplossing-een-nederlandse-cloud-a4882880
14. European Commission. 2024. “European research development and deployment of AI.” Shaping Europe’s Digital Future. November 19, 2024. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-ai-research
15. European Commission. 2024. “Commission Launches AI Innovation Package to Support Artificial Intelligence Startups and SMEs.” Press release. January 24, 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_383.
16. European Commission. 2024. “New Horizon Europe Funding Boosts European Research in AI and Quantum Technologies”. European Commission (publication). April 23, 2024. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/new-horizon-europe-funding-boosts-european-research-ai-and-quantum-technologies.
17. Bronzwear, Stijn. 2025. “Ook in Europa gaat het AI-debat nu over investeren, investeren, investeren.” NRC. February 11, 2025. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/02/11/ook-in-europa-gaat-het-ai-debat-nu-over-investeren-investeren-investeren-a4882715
18. De Koning, Marloes. 2025. “Onze afhankelijkheid van Big Tech is gevaarlijk, waarschuwen techneuten. Ze willen een Nederlandse cloud bouwen.” NRC. February 12, 2025. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/02/12/onze-afhankelijkheid-van-big-tech-is-gevaarlijk-waarschuwen-techneuten-de-oplossing-een-nederlandse-cloud-a4882880.
19. Breeden, Aurelien and Liz Alderman. 2025. “Macron Pitches Lighter Regulation to Fuel A.I. Boom in Europe”. The New York Times. February 10, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/business/ai-summit-paris.html.
20. Sanger, David E. 2025. “Vance, in First Foreign Speech, Tells Europe That U.S. Will Dominate A.I.” The New York Times. February 11, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/11/world/europe/vance-speech-paris-ai-summit.html.
21. Ditsche, Jochen, Maria Mikhaylenko. 2024. “European AI Act: Opportunities and Challenges.” Roland Berger (blog). May 8, 2024. https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/European-AI-Act-Opportunities-and-challenges.html.
22. Bronzwear, Stijn. 2025. “Ook in Europa gaat het AI-debat nu over investeren, investeren, investeren.” NRC. February 11, 2025. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/02/11/ook-in-europa-gaat-het-ai-debat-nu-over-investeren-investeren-investeren-a4882715
23. European Commission. 2024. “New Horizon Europe Funding Boosts European Research in AI and Quantum Technologies”. European Commission (publication). April 23, 2024. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/new-horizon-europe-funding-boosts-european-research-ai-and-quantum-technologies.
24. Veolia. 2025. “Veolia and Mistral AI Join Forces to Revolutionize Resource Efficiency.” Veolia, February 20, 2025. https://www.veolia.com/en/our-media/press-releases/veolia-and-mistral-ai-join-forces-revolutionize-resource-efficiency.
25. Orange. 2025. “Orange and Mistral AI Join Forces to Accelerate Artificial Intelligence Development in Europe.” Orange Newsroom, February 20, 2025. https://newsroom.orange.com/orange-and-mistral-ai-join-forces-to-accelerate-artificial-intelligence-development-in-europe/.
26. Cools, Hannes. 2025. “De ‘AI-race’ Heeft Geen Finish.” NRC, February 19, 2025. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/02/18/de-ai-race-heeft-geen-finish-a4883525.
27. Klein, Maria. 2025. Digital Sovereignty: Challenges and Opportunities for the EU in a Globalized World. January 1, 2025. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5078881.
28. European Commission. 2024. “New Horizon Europe Funding Boosts European Research in AI and Quantum Technologies”. European Commission (publication). April 23, 2024. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/new-horizon-europe-funding-boosts-european-research-ai-and-quantum-technologies.
29. Klein, Maria. 2025. Digital Sovereignty: Challenges and Opportunities for the EU in a Globalized World. January 1, 2025. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5078881.
30. De Koning, Marloes. 2025. “Onze afhankelijkheid van Big Tech is gevaarlijk, waarschuwen techneuten. Ze willen een Nederlandse cloud bouwen.” NRC. February 12, 2025. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/02/12/onze-afhankelijkheid-van-big-tech-is-gevaarlijk-waarschuwen-techneuten-de-oplossing-een-nederlandse-cloud-a4882880.